Key Concerns Within the Scholarly Communication Process « University of Melbourne Library Intelligencer

Pages
- About Library Intelligencer
Categories
- academic libraries (93)
- access platforms (63)
- archives (2)
- benchmarking (1)
- bibliographic software (5)
- bibliometrics (30)
- blogs (10)
- browsers (1)
- calculators (1)
- cataloguing (7)
- collection management (4)
- conference proceedings (116)
- conferences (7)
- content management software (1)
- copyright (39)
- creative commons (10)
- cultural collections (52)
- cultural institutions (25)
- data curation (21)
- data protection (1)
- data repositories (20)
- databases (46)
- digital archives (31)
- digital backfiles (13)
- digital information (4)
- digital preservation (42)
- digitisation (25)
- document delivery (1)
- ebooks (111)
- educational resources (168)
- email discussion lists (1)
- Endnote (2)
- eportfolios (1)
- federated searching (3)
- films (1)
- Google (13)
- government reports (13)
- higher education (64)
- identity management (11)
- ILMS (20)
- images (65)
- information infrastructure (5)
- information literacy (38)
- information seeking habits (4)
- information technology (51)
- institutional repositories (68)
- intellectual property (5)
- interlibrary loans (2)
- Internet (10)
- journal ranking (14)
- Learning Management Systems (3)
- librarians (4)
- librarianship journals (41)
- libraries (3)
- library catalogues (2)
- metadata (11)
- net gen (1)
- newsletters (75)
- online teaching and learning (37)
- open access (711)
- open courseware (26)
- open source projects (25)
- patents (1)
- peer review (4)
- Plagiarism (7)
- preservation (3)
- professional development (19)
- project management (1)
- publisher news (58)
- records management (1)
- research (49)
- research assessment (11)
- scholarly communication (18)
- scholarly journals (427)
- scholarly publishing (62)
- scopus (11)
- search engines (16)
- social networking (56)
- statistics (12)
- teaching and learning (17)
- thesauri (2)
- theses (6)
- training (4)
- Uncategorized (40)
- university presses (4)
- university rankings (3)
- upcoming conferences (23)
- vendor news (51)
- videos (12)
- virtual organisations (1)
- web 2.0 (57)
Archives

Key Concerns Within the Scholarly Communication Process

Posted on April 29, 2008 by lilyheart

http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/aboutus/workinggroups/topconcernsreport.doc

A report to the JISC Scholarly Communications Working Group

Prepared by:

Alma Swan

Key Perspectives Ltd

March 2008

Filed under: scholarly communication | Tagged: scholarly communication

« Science 2.0 — Is Open Access Science the Future? NIH Public Access Policy of 2008: New Guide for MIT Authors »

Leave a Reply